首页> 外文OA文献 >Single port/incision laparoscopic surgery compared with standard three-port laparoscopic surgery for appendicectomy - a randomised controlled trial.
【2h】

Single port/incision laparoscopic surgery compared with standard three-port laparoscopic surgery for appendicectomy - a randomised controlled trial.

机译:与阑尾切除术的标准三孔腹腔镜手术相比,单孔/切口腹腔镜手术是一项随机对照试验。

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic surgery has become the preferred approach for many procedures because of reduced post-operative pain, better recovery, shorter hospital stay and improved cosmesis. Single incision laparoscopic surgery is one of the many recent variants where either standard ports or a specially designed single multi-channel port is introduced through a single skin incision. While the cosmetic advantage of this is obvious, the evidence base for claims of reduced morbidity and better post-operative recovery is weak. This study aims to compare the effectiveness of single port/incision laparoscopic appendicectomy with standard three-port laparoscopic appendicectomy in adult patients at six weeks post-surgery. We also wish to assess the feasibility of a multicentre randomised controlled trial comparing single port/incision laparoscopic surgery with standard three-port laparoscopic surgery for other surgical techniques. METHODS AND DESIGN: Patients diagnosed with suspected appendicitis and requiring surgical treatment will be randomised to receive either standard three-port or single incision laparoscopic surgery. Data will be collected from clinical notes, operation notes and patient reported questionnaires. The following outcomes will be considered:1. Effectiveness of the surgical procedure in terms of:•patient reported outcomes•clinical outcomes•resource use2. Feasibility of conducting a randomised controlled trial (RCT) in the emergency surgical setting by quantifying:•patient eligibility•randomisation acceptability•feasibility of blinding participants to the intervention received•completion rates of case report forms and patient reported questionnaires TRIAL REGISTRATION: ISRCTN66443895 (assigned 10 March 2011, first patient randomised 09 January 2011).
机译:背景:腹腔镜手术已成为许多手术的首选方法,因为术后疼痛减轻,恢复更好,住院时间更短,美容效果更好。单切口腹腔镜手术是最近的许多变体之一,其中通过单个皮肤切口引入标准端口或经特殊设计的单个多通道端口。尽管这样做的美容优势很明显,但声称发病率降低和术后恢复更好的证据基础薄弱。这项研究旨在比较手术后六周的成年患者单孔/切口腹腔镜阑尾切除术与标准三孔腹腔镜阑尾切除术的有效性。我们还希望评估将单端口/切口腹腔镜手术与标准三端口腹腔镜手术用于其他手术技术进行比较的多中心随机对照试验的可行性。方法和设计:被诊断患有可疑阑尾炎并需要手术治疗的患者将被随机分配接受标准三孔或单切口腹腔镜手术。将从临床记录,手术记录和患者报告的问卷中收集数据。将考虑以下结果:1。手术程序在以下方面的有效性:•患者报告的结果•临床结果•资源使用2。通过量化以下内容在紧急外科手术环境中进行随机对照试验(RCT)的可行性:•患者资格•随机接受度•盲人参与者接受干预的可行性•病例报告表和患者报告调查表的完成率试验注册:ISRCTN66443895(已分配) 2011年3月10日,首例患者于2011年1月9日随机分组)。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号